(Fig.1) ↓ Fake "future" target = quantum ?
Quantum mechanics invented 100 years ago is unrealistic and useless, relying on fictitious quasiparticles to explain all physical phenomena.
Quasiparticle is unreal, having fake (= effective ) mass and charge, which are freely-adjustable to deal with different phenomena, so meaningless in predicting new reactions.
For useless quantum physics to get research funds, physicists needed to create fake target = fictional quantum computer which is supposed to exploit fantasy parallel worlds for faster (← ? ) parallel computing ? ← still Not reality.
To hide the inconvenient fact that the current quantum physics is useless with No progress, academia spreads fake news to deceive people into falsely believing their researches are worth taxpayers' money.
If you carefully read each quantum technology news, you will notice they make No progress, just using misleading phrases to get your hopes up.
This week solid-physics is still full of unreal quasi-particle such as phonon ( this, this ), exciton ( this, this ), polariton ( this ), polaron ( this ), plasmon ( this, this ).
Other unreal quasiparticles are magnon ( this, this ), Majorana fermion, Weyl fermion ( this ).
Valleytronics is one of the current meaningless solid-physics fields which uses nonphysical band and unreal quasiparticle exciton when they try to describe physical phenomena in materials.
The last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "Our method could be extended to manipulate valley exciton (= unreal quasiparticle ) ... would help to develop photonic devices based on valleytronics ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research. Unreal quasiparticle exciton is just nonphysical math symbols or band ( this p.4, p.18 ) with No physical shape.
The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "What I find extremely exciting is an almost perfect match between the experimental data and our first-principles theoretical calculations ?" ← Just saying "exciting" without showing any detailed practical application, because their "theoretical model" is based on unreal quasiparticles ( this p.3 Fig.1 phonon, its p.7 magnon ).
The 9th paragraph of this news says "including the kinds of particles, called anyons (= unreal quasiparticle )" and its 2nd last paragraph just vaguely says "The authors haven't yet worked out how .. that remains an open problem for future research ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "created an algorithm that speeds up the rate of calculations in the early quantum computers which are currently being developed ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The 5th-7th paragraphs of this news just vaguely say "Quantum computing has the potential to solve equations ? Through quantum computing, we will be able to analyze very complicated phenomena ? Quantum computing uses units called qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously (= fantasy parallel worlds ) ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Still useless research.
The 3rd paragraph of this news just vaguely says "We have found a new paradox in quantum mechanics ? one of our two most fundamental scientific theories, together with Einstein's theory of relativity that throws doubt on some common-sense ideas about physical reality" ← Because these current mainstream physics lacks reality from the beginning.
The 5th paragraph of this news says "quantum physics can provide inspiration. The randomness of mutations in evolution has intriguing (= quantum mechanical randomness is chaotic, scientifically meaningless )" and its last paragraph just vaguely says "the next phase of their research will be to conduct direct experimental testing ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The 1st-2nd paragraphs of this news just vaguely say "so far theoretical work on spintronics has been outweighing experimental research... have proposed a new model that describes electron spin behavior in a semiconductor nanowire ?" :← Just "theoretically proposing artificial model" is still useless.
The 2nd last paragraph of this news just vaguely says "a model material that paves the way for future spintronics applications ? (= spintronics itself is just "name", Not application ). In further steps, the researchers at JGU want to investigate how quickly information can be saved ?" ← just talking about "imaginary future". Nothing is realized now.
The 6th paragraph of this news just vaguely says "when we realized that the dark matter haloes that surround primordial black holes would be a way to observe Planet 9 if it was a black hole ?" ← Meaningless research about fictional, contradictory black hole which is too far away to confirm. They misunderstand "ordinary light refraction by dusts around stars as "imaginary dark matter haloes" or black hole gravity.
The 3rd paragraph of this news says "Shortly after being produced in proton proton collisions at the LHC, these heavy mesons transform or decay into a variety of lighter particles (= imaginable tetraquark is undetectable directly ) ?" and its 2nd last paragraph just says "jury is still out as to what a tetraquark really is." ← Still useless research about "imaginary" particles just wasting taxpayers' money.
The first paragraph of this news just vaguely says "This will give the observatory the ability to see supernova explosions in more distant (= billions of light years away = so meaningless for us ) galaxies as well ?" ← Typical example of meaningless research about "imaginary objects" which is too distant to be useful or confirm, and they intentionally misinterpret neutrino only for the current fictional physics and seeking Nobel prize.
2020/8/28 updated. Feel free to link to this site.
